ArticleBMC cancer2025
Trends in symptom severity and complexity in patients undergoing radiation therapy.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Stepped-care models for cancer symptom management: a systematic review of efficacy and cost-effectiveness.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Pooled it
- Physical activity level and its determinants in patients with cancer: a secondary analysis using a decision-tree approach.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Effects of evidence-based nursing under a quantitative assessment strategy on cancer-related fatigue, self-management ability, and quality of life in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Narrative foreclosure among patients with chronic diseases: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Symptom severity and complexity have considerable impact on a patient's cancer care journey. This study describes symptom scores of radiotherapy patients across their radiotherapy care trajectory and factors associated with symptom complexity. Patients who received radiotherapy at a single tertiary cancer center, who also completed at least one symptom-reporting questionnaire, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale- Revised (ESAS-r) between October 1, 2019 and April 1, 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. Symptom assessment time points were pre-treatment, start and end of radiation treatment and post-treatment follow-up. Mean ESAS-r scores for individual symptoms were descriptively analyzed by assessment timing and tumour group. We calculated a symptom complexity score for each ESAS-r measurement, using a validated algorithm, and assigned overall symptom complexity as low, moderate or severe. We modelled the association between assessment timing, and tumor group, with symptom complexity using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). The study cohort consisted of 1,632 patients who completed 2,519 ESAS-r questionnaires. Patients with lung and H&N cancers reported higher mean symptom scores compared to other tumour groups. Patients at the start of treatment had significantly lower odds of having a more severe symptom complexity, compared with patients pre-treatment (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.64-0.93). Patients with H&N and lung cancer and patients prior to starting radiation may benefit most from increased symptom support and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.