ArticleBMC nephrology2025
Analysis of the kidney failure risk equation implementation in routine clinical practice and health inequalities in chronic kidney disease care: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting kidney failure risk without albuminuria: implications in chronic kidney disease.BMJ medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNICE guidelines recommend GPs use the kidney failure risk equation (KFRE) to identify people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at higher risk of kidney failure. Albuminuria results are required to calculate KFRE.
aimAnalyse the implementation of KFRE into clinical practice and investigate if albuminuria testing varied amongst patients with CKD, particularly for underserved groups. DESIGN AND
settingRetrospective cohort study of 23,063 adults in Glasgow from 2013 to 2022.
methodWe evaluated albuminuria testing rates and the predictive performance of KFRE in estimating 5-year kidney failure risk amongst people with CKD. Logistic regression models quantified associations between demographic/clinical variables and albuminuria testing. Amongst people who developed kidney failure, we retrospectively assessed the impact of KFRE on the timing of meeting criteria for referral to renal services.
resultsAlbuminuria testing was performed in 44.5% of 10,874 adults with CKD. Females (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.86: 95% CI 0.79-0.93) and those with hypertension (aOR 0.69: 95% CI 0.63-0.77) were less likely to have albuminuria testing. Those aged 40-50 years (aOR 1.83: 95% CI 1.15-2.91), with diabetes (aOR 2.35: 95% CI 2.14-2.58) and living in the least socioeconomically deprived areas (aOR 1.11: 95% CI 1.00-1.23) were more likely to have albuminuria testing. Of 1,352 individuals with incident kidney failure, incorporating KFRE into referral guidelines helped identify high-risk patients early.
conclusionKFRE could be calculated for less than half of people due to lack of albuminuria testing. Focus should be given to improving albuminuria testing and inequities identified to allow wider implementation of KFRE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.