ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Implantation of trifocal intraocular lens in mild pathologic myopia: visual outcomes and influence of fundus structures.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feasibility and Postoperative Outcome After Duet Procedure for Reversible Multifocality in Eyes with Co-Pathologies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the visual outcomes of simple high myopia (HM) and mild pathologic myopia (PM) following implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL), and investigate the influence of fundus structures.
methodsWe retrospectively studied 63 high myopic eyes of 63 patients underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with implantation of AT LISA tri 839MP IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany) between July 2020 and September 2024. 34 eyes in the HM group and 29 eyes in the PM group. Main visual outcomes including monocular corrected distance (4 m, CDVA), distance-corrected intermediate (80 cm, DCIVA), distance-corrected near (40 cm, DCNVA) visual acuity, defocus curves, and subjective refraction. Optical coherence tomograph was employed to evaluate macular tilt degree (MTD), central foveal thickness, and subfoveal choroidal thickness. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent predictors of visual acuity in the PM group.
resultsThe CDVA, DCIVA, and DCNVA were 0.00 ± 0.00, 0.08 ± 0.05, and 0.09 ± 0.07 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in the HM group, 0.02 ± 0.05, 0.15 ± 0.09, and 0.17 ± 0.09 logMAR in the PM group, respectively. In the PM group, mean MTD was 17.13 ± 6.79°. The MTD demonstrated a significant predictive effect on CDVA (regression coefficient: 0.005; P = 0.026) and DCNVA (regression coefficient: 0.015; P = 0.003).
conclusionTrifocal IOL implantation yielded favorable visual outcomes in simple high myopic eyes, though results were comparatively poorer in PM cases. MTD was associated with the expected visual outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.