ArticleCommunications medicine2025
5-hydroxymethylcytosine sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA identifies epigenomic features in prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapies.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Urinary DNA Methylation and Hydroxymethylation Dynamics as Candidate Biomarkers of Occupational Chemical Exposure-An Exploratory Pilot Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Integrative Whole-Genome and Epigenome Profiling of cfDNA in Familial Prostate Cancer: Insights from a Pilot Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine: a key epigenetic mark in cancer and chemotherapy response.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2025Review
- The Years 2015-2025 as a Prospective Decade for the Identification of Specific Methylation Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- DNA methylation patterns and predictive models for metabolic disease risk in offspring of gestational diabetes mellitus.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- 5hmC-profiles in Puerto Rican Hispanic/Latino men with aggressive prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe evaluated whether 5hmC signatures in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are associated with treatment failure to androgen-deprivation therapies (ADT) among men with hormone-naive prostate cancer.
methodsWe collected a total of 139 serial plasma samples from 55 prostate cancer patients receiving ADT at 3 time points including baseline (before initiating ADT, n = 55); 3 months (after initiating ADT, n = 55); and disease progression (n = 15) within 24 months or 24 months if no progression was detected (n = 14). We used selective chemical labeling sequencing to quantify 5hmC abundance across the genome and Kaplan-Meier analysis to assess survival association.
resultsHere we show a significant 5hmC difference in 1642 of 23433 genes between patients with and without progression (false discovery rate [FDR] < 0.1) in baseline plasma samples. Patients with progression demonstrate significant 5hmC enrichments in multiple hallmark gene sets, with androgen responses as the top enriched gene-set (FDR = 1.19E-13). We further show a significant association between high activity scores in these gene sets and poor progression-free survival (P < 0.05), even after adjusting for circulating tumor DNA fraction and prostate-specific antigen values. Additionally, our longitudinal analysis shows that the high activity score is significantly reduced after 3 months of initiating ADT (P = 0.0004) but returns to higher levels when the disease progresses (P = 0.0317).
conclusions5hmC-based activity scores from gene-sets involved in AR responses show great potential in assessing treatment resistance, monitoring disease progression, and identifying patients who would benefit from upfront treatment intensification. However, further studies are needed to validate these findings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.