Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038515›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Regional computing approach for educational big data.

Bader Alshemaimri, Afzal Badshah, Ali Daud, Amal Bukhari, Raed Alsini, Omar Alghushairy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bader Alshemaimri *Software Engineering Department, College of Computing and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Afzal Badshah *Department of Software Engineering, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan. afzalbadshahkhattak@gmail.com.
Ali Daud *Faculty of Resilience, Rabdan Academy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Amal Bukhari *Department of Information Systems and Technology, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Raed Alsini *Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Omar Alghushairy *Department of Information Systems and Technology, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The educational landscape is witnessing a transformation with the integration of Educational Technology (Edutech). As educational institutions adopt digital platforms and tools, the generation of Educational Big Data (EBD) has significantly increased. Research indicates that educational institutions produce massive data, including student enrollment records, academic performance metrics, attendance records, learning activities, and interactions within digital learning environments. This influx of data needs efficient processing to derive actionable insights and enhance the learning experience. Real-time data processing has a critical part in educational environments to support various functions such as personalized learning, adaptive assessment, and administrative decision-making. However, there may be challenges in sending large amounts of educational data to cloud servers, i.e., latency, cost and network congestion. These challenges make it more difficult to provide educators and students with timely insights and services, which reduces the efficiency of educational activities. This paper proposes a Regional Computing (RC) paradigm designed specifically for big data management in education to address these issues. In this case, RC is established within educational regions and intended to decentralize data processing. To reduce dependency on cloud infrastructure, these regional servers are strategically located to collect, process, and store big data related to education regionally. Our investigation results show that RC significantly reduces latency to 203.11 ms for 2,000 devices, compared to 707.1 ms in Cloud Computing (CC). It is also more cost-efficient, with a total cost of just 1.14 USD versus 5.36 USD in the cloud. Furthermore, it avoids the 600% congestion surges seen in cloud setups and maintains consistent throughput under high workloads, establishing RC as the optimal solution for managing EBD.

Indexed as

Big DataEducational TechnologyCloud ComputingHumansBig dataCloud computingEdge computingEducationEducational big dataRegional computing

Identifiers

PMID40038515
PMCPMC11880451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.