ArticleScientific reports2025
Classifying metro drivers' cognitive distractions during manual operations using machine learning and random forest-recursive feature elimination.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Physiological Assessment of Attentional States and Driving Styles in Simulated Driving.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence strategies based on random forests for detecting ischemia-reperfusion injury changes in kidney tissue during intravital imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metro drivers are more likely to trigger accidents if they suffer from cognitive distractions during manual driving. However, identifying metro drivers' cognitive distractions faces challenges as generally no obvious behavior can be found during the distractions. To address the challenge, this paper identifies metro drivers' cognitive distractions based on Electrocardiogram (ECG) signals collected by wearable devices in simulated driving experiments. The ECG signals are processed to generate ultra-short-term heart rate and heart rate variability (HR-HRV) features. The HR-HRV features are extracted by 30-s and 60-s time-windows in driving phase, and 25-s time-windows in parking phase, respectively. Machine learning approaches are developed to identify distractions (binary) and distinguish the degrees of distractions (multi-class). The optimal input features are determined by a random forest and recursive feature elimination (RF-RFE) algorithm. Results show that the DT with only one HR-HRV feature extracted from 30-s time-windows and XGBoost with 20 h-HRV features extracted from 60-s time-windows are optimal models for binary and multi-class classification for distractions during driving phase, respectively. The features including NN20, pNN20, SD1/SD2, Max-HR, Min-HR, and MEDNN are the most critical HR-HRV features associated with distractions. Cognitive distractions in parking phase are difficult to be detected using HR-HRV features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.