ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploration of ureolytic airborne bacteria for biocementation applications from different climate zones in Japan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cell-in-Bead-in-Droplet Platform for pH-Based Microfluidic Screening of Ureolytic Bacteria.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study investigated the ureolytic airborne bacteria for microbial induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) applications, seeking resilient strains in order to address the problems of bacterial survivability and adaptability in biocementation treatment and to contribute a robust approach that can effectively stabilize diverse soils. Since the airborne bacteria tend to survive in dynamic environments, they are believed to possess remarkable adaptability in harsh conditions, thus holding great potential for engineering applications. Samplings across diverse climatic zones revealed that approximately 10-20% of the isolates were ureolytic bacteria in each sampling site. A series of characterization tests were conducted on selected strains to study the temperature dependency of urease activity. The results revealed that many of these isolates are unique in many aspects. For instance, some trains of Glutamicibacter sp. were found to precipitate extra-large calcium carbonate crystals that could be beneficial in the cementation of coarse soils. This study stands out from previous research on standard ureolytic bacteria by focusing on the exploration of airborne bacteria. The findings demonstrate that a significant number of ureolytic airborne bacteria have great potential, suggesting that the air can serve as a bacterial isolation source for MICP applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.