Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038425›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Differential effects of robot's touch on perceived emotions and the feeling of Kawaii in adults and seniors.

Masahiro Shiomi, Hidenobu Sumioka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Masahiro ShiomiDepartment of Interaction Science Laboratories, Deep Interaction Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, 619-0288, Japan. m-shiomi@atr.jp.
Hidenobu SumiokaPresence Media Research Group, Hiroshi Ishiguro Laboratories, Deep Interaction Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, 619-0288, Japan.

Funding

JST Moonshot R&D Grant Number JPMJMS2011MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) JP21H04897MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) JP24K21327MEXT | JST | Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) JPMJCR18A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using social robots is a promising approach for supporting senior citizens in the context of super-aging societies. The essential design factors for achieving socially acceptable robots include effective emotional expressions and cuteness. Past studies have reported the effectiveness of robot-initiated touching behaviors toward interacting partners on these two factors in the context of interaction with adults, although the effects of such touch behaviors on them are unknown in seniors. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the effects of robot-initiated touch behaviors on perceived emotions (valence and arousal) and the feeling of kawaii, a common Japanese adjective for expressing cute, lovely, or adorable. In experiments with Japanese participants (adults: 21-49, seniors: 65-79) using a baby-type robot, our results showed that the robot's touch significantly increased the perceived valence regardless of the expressed emotions and the ages of the participants. Our results also showed that the robot's touch was effective in adults in the context of arousal and the feeling of kawaii, but not in seniors. We discussed the differential effects of robot-initiated touch between adults and seniors by focusing on emotional processing in the latter. The findings of this study have implications for designing social robots that have the capability of physical interaction with seniors.

Indexed as

EmotionsRoboticsTouchAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40038425
PMCPMC11880510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.