Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038410›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2025

The effects of social media abstinence on affective well-being and life satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laura Lemahieu, Yannick Vander Zwalmen, Marthe Mennes, Ernst H W Koster, Mariek M P Vanden Abeele, Karolien Poels

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Smartphone bans in schools remain unproven.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura LemahieuDepartment of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. laura.lemahieu@uantwerpen.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9385-822X
Yannick Vander ZwalmenDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0681-5983
Marthe MennesDepartment of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1085-3722
Ernst H W KosterDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0792-476X
Mariek M P Vanden Abeeleimec-mict-UGent, Department of Communication Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1806-6991
Karolien PoelsDepartment of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5276-0293

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the European Research Council Starting Grant agreement 950635Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen) S005923NResearch Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen) T000720N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstaining from social media has become a popular digital disconnection strategy of individuals to enhance their well-being. To date, it is unclear whether social media abstinences are truly effective in improving well-being, however, as studies produce inconsistent outcomes. This preregistered systematic review and meta-analysis therefore aims to provide a more precise answer regarding the impact of social media abstinence on well-being. The databases of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Communication Source, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched for studies examining the effect of social media abstinence on three outcomes, namely positive affect, negative affect, and/or life satisfaction. In total, ten studies (N = 4674) were included, allowing an examination of 38 effect sizes across these three outcomes. The analyses revealed no significant effects of social media abstinence interventions on positive affect, negative affect, or life satisfaction. Relationships between social media abstinence duration and the three outcomes were also non-significant. The findings thus suggest that temporarily stepping away from social media may not be the most optimal approach to enhance individual well-being, emphasizing the need for further research on alternative disconnection strategies. Nevertheless, important methodological differences between studies should be considered when interpreting these results.

Indexed as

AffectPersonal SatisfactionSocial MediaHumans

Identifiers

PMID40038410
PMCPMC11880199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.