ArticleScientific reports2025
Statistical learning re-shapes the center-surround inhibition of the visuo-spatial attentional focus.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To effectively navigate a crowded and dynamic visual world, our neurocognitive system possesses the remarkable ability to extract and learn its statistical regularities to implicitly guide the allocation of spatial attention resources in the immediate future. The way through which we deploy attention in the visual space has been consistently outlined by a "center-surround inhibition" pattern, wherein a ring of sustained inhibition is projected around the center of the attentional focus to optimize the signal-noise ratio between goal-relevant targets and interfering distractors. While it has been observed that experience-dependent mechanisms could disrupt the inhibitory ring, whether statistical learning of spatial contingencies has an effect on such a surround inhibition and - if any - through which exact mechanisms it unravels are hitherto unexplored questions. Therefore, in a visual search psychophysical experiment, we aimed to fill this gap by entirely mapping the visuo-spatial attentional profile, asking subjects (N = 26) to detect and report the gap orientation of a 'C' letter appearing either as a color singleton (Baseline Condition) or as a non-salient probe (Probe Condition) - among other irrelevant objects - at progressively increasing probe-to-singleton distances. Critically, we manipulated the color singleton spatial contingency so as to make it appear more frequently adjacent to the probe, specifically at a spatial distance where attending the color singleton generates surround-inhibition on the probe, hindering attentional performance. Results showed that statistical learning markedly reshaped the attentional focus, transforming the center-surround inhibition profile into a non-linear gradient one through a performance gain over the high probability probe-to-singleton distance. Noteworthy, such reshaping was uneven in time and asymmetric, as it varied across blocks and specifically appeared only within manipulated visual quadrants, leaving unaltered the unmanipulated ones. Our findings offer insights of theoretical interest in understanding how environmental regularities orchestrate the way we allocate attention in space through plastic re-weighting of spatial priority maps. Additionally, going beyond the physical dimension, our data provide interesting implications about how visual information is coded within working memory representations, especially under scenarios of heightened uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.