ArticleScientific reports2025
Knowledge graph construction for intelligent cockpits based on large language models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As intelligent cockpits rapidly evolve towards "proactive natural interaction," traditional rule-based user behavior inference methods are facing scalability, generalization, and accuracy bottlenecks, leading to the development and deployment of functions oriented towards pseudo-demands. Effectively capturing and representing the hidden associative knowledge in intelligent cockpits can enhance the system's understanding of user behavior and environmental contexts, thereby precisely discerning real user needs. In this context, knowledge graphs (KGs) have emerged as an effective tool, enabling the retrieval and organization of vast amounts of information within interconnected and interpretable structures. However, rapidly and flexibly generating domain-specific KGs still poses significant challenges. To address this, this paper introduces a novel knowledge graph construction (KGC) model, GLM-TripleGen, dedicated to analyzing the states and behaviors within intelligent cockpits. This model aims to precisely mine the latent relationships between cockpit state factors and behavioral sequences, effectively addressing key challenges such as the ambiguity in entity recognition and the complexity of relationship extraction within cockpit data. To enhance the adaptability of GLM-TripleGen to the intelligent cockpit domain, this paper constructs an instruction-following dataset based on vehicle states and in-cockpit interaction behaviors, containing a large number of prompt texts paired with corresponding triple labels, to support model fine-tuning. During the fine-tuning process, the Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) method is employed to effectively optimize model parameters, significantly reducing training costs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that GLM-TripleGen outperforms existing state-of-the-art KGC methods, accurately generating normalized cockpit triple units. Furthermore, GLM-TripleGen exhibits exceptional robustness and generalization ability, handling various unknown entities and relationships with minimal generalization processing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.