ArticleScientific reports2025
Interpretable adaptive fault detection method for smart grid based on belief rule base.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A spam detection model based on the discriminative TF-IDF belief rule base.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Chaos-Enhanced, Optimization-Based Interpretable Classification Model and Performance Evaluation in Food Drying.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI-driven cybersecurity framework for anomaly detection in power systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A student academic performance prediction model based on the interval belief rule base.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An effective fault detection strategy has always been the focus of smart grid system research. Fast and accurate fault detection is the basis for complex systems to maintain reliability and security. However, traditional fault detection methods often ignore the interpretability of the model while pursuing high detection accuracy. Complex models can usually provide higher detection accuracy, but often lack transparency and interpretability, making it difficult for operators to understand and trust the detection results of the model. Therefore, a new fault detection strategy based on an adaptive interpretable belief rule base (AI-BRB) is proposed. This method considers the adaptive updating of the search domain of the model accuracy to achieve the balance and optimization between the two conflicting objectives of the model interpretability and the detection accuracy. The fault detection model based on AI-BRB considers the interpretability of modeling, inference and optimization processes. In the optimization process, interpretability constraints are added to maintain the interpretability of the optimized model. In addition, in order to avoid falling into the local optimal solution in the optimization process, the search domain is updated adaptively according to the accuracy of the model, which improves the interpretability and robustness of the fault detection model. Finally, an example is given to prove that the proposed method can improve the accuracy of fault detection and the interpretability of the model compared with the existing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.