Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038386›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Dynamical analysis and numerical assessment of the 2019-nCoV virus transmission with optimal control.

Shuo Li, Tahir Khan, Qasem M Al-Mdallal, Fuad A Awwad, Gul Zaman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shuo LiSchool of Mathematics and Data Sciences, Changji University, Changji, Xinjiang, 831100, People's Republic of China.
Tahir KhanDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Swabi Woman University, Swabi, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. tahirmaths200014@gmail.com.
Qasem M Al-MdallalDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, UAE University, P.O. Box 15551, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates. q.almdallal@uaeu.ac.ae.
Fuad A AwwadDepartment of Quantitative analysis, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, P.O. Box 71115, Riyadh, 11587, Saudi Arabia.
Gul ZamanDepartment of Mathematics, University of Malakand Chakdara, Dir (L), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we discuss the qualitative analysis and develop an optimal control mechanism to study the dynamics of the novel coronavirus disease (2019-nCoV) transmission using an epidemiological model. With the help of a suitable mathematical model, health officials often can take positive measures to control the infection. To develop the model, we assume two disease transmission sources (humans and reservoirs) keeping in view the characteristics of novel coronavirus transmission. We formulate the model to study the temporal dynamics and determine an optimal control mechanism to minimize the infected population and control the spreading of the novel coronavirus disease propagation. In addition, to understand the significance of each model parameter, we compute the threshold quantity and perform the sensitivity analysis of the basic reproductive number. Based on the temporal dynamics of the model and sensitivity analysis of the threshold parameter, we develop a control mechanism to identify the best control policy for eradicating the disease. We then conduct numerical experiments using large-scale numerical simulations to validate the theoretical findings.

Indexed as

COVID-19Basic Reproduction NumberComputer SimulationEpidemiological ModelsHumansModels, TheoreticalSARS-CoV-2Epidemiological modelNumerical simulationOptimal control theoryStability analysisThreshold parameter

Identifiers

PMID40038386
PMCPMC11880544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.