ArticleScientific reports2025
Explainable artificial intelligence for botnet detection in internet of things.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A resource efficient IoT intrusion detection model using hybrid feature selection for edge computing.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advancing Machine Learning Strategies for Power Consumption-Based IoT Botnet Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Enhancing IIoT security through blockchain-enabled workload analysis in fog computing environments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proliferation of internet of things (IoT) devices has led to unprecedented connectivity and convenience. However, this increased interconnectivity has also introduced significant security challenges, particularly concerning the detection and mitigation of botnet attacks. Detecting botnet activities in IoT environments is challenging due to the diverse nature of IoT devices and the large-scale data generated. Artificial intelligence and machine learning based approaches showed great potential in IoT botnet detection. However, as these approaches continue to advance and become more complex, new questions are opened about how decisions are made using such technologies. Integrating an explainability layer into these models can increase trustworthy and transparency. This paper proposes the utilization of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques for improving the interpretability and transparency of the botnet detection process. It analyzes the impact of incorporating XAI in the botnet detection process, including enhanced model interpretability, trustworthiness, and potential for early detection of emerging botnet attack patterns. Three different XAI based techniques are presented i.e. rule extraction and distillation, local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME), Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, providing valuable insights into the inner workings of the detection model and facilitating the development of robust defense mechanisms against IoT botnet attacks. The findings of this study contribute to the growing body of research on XAI in cybersecurity and offer practical guidance for securing IoT ecosystems against botnet threats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.