Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038372›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Explainable artificial intelligence for botnet detection in internet of things.

Mohamed Saied, Shawkat Guirguis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohamed SaiedInstitute of Graduate Studies & Research, Alexandria University, 832, Elhorrya Road, Alexandria, 21526, Egypt. igsr.msaied@alexu.edu.eg.
Shawkat GuirguisInstitute of Graduate Studies & Research, Alexandria University, 832, Elhorrya Road, Alexandria, 21526, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proliferation of internet of things (IoT) devices has led to unprecedented connectivity and convenience. However, this increased interconnectivity has also introduced significant security challenges, particularly concerning the detection and mitigation of botnet attacks. Detecting botnet activities in IoT environments is challenging due to the diverse nature of IoT devices and the large-scale data generated. Artificial intelligence and machine learning based approaches showed great potential in IoT botnet detection. However, as these approaches continue to advance and become more complex, new questions are opened about how decisions are made using such technologies. Integrating an explainability layer into these models can increase trustworthy and transparency. This paper proposes the utilization of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques for improving the interpretability and transparency of the botnet detection process. It analyzes the impact of incorporating XAI in the botnet detection process, including enhanced model interpretability, trustworthiness, and potential for early detection of emerging botnet attack patterns. Three different XAI based techniques are presented i.e. rule extraction and distillation, local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME), Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, providing valuable insights into the inner workings of the detection model and facilitating the development of robust defense mechanisms against IoT botnet attacks. The findings of this study contribute to the growing body of research on XAI in cybersecurity and offer practical guidance for securing IoT ecosystems against botnet threats.

Indexed as

Botnet detectionCyber securityExplainable artificial intelligenceInternet of thingsMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40038372
PMCPMC11880306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.