Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038369›Full record

Reviewnpj biodiversity2025

Advocating microbial diversity conservation in Antarctica.

Laura Zucconi, Natalia Fierro-Vásquez, André Antunes, Amanda Gonçalves Bendia, Paris Lavin, Marcelo González-Aravena, Rajesh Kumar Sani, Aparna Banerjee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in npj biodiversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Microbial conservation is essential for sustaining ecosystem functions and services.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura ZucconiDepartment of Ecological and Biological Sciences, University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy.
Natalia Fierro-VásquezDepartamento de Biotecnología, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Recursos Biológicos, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta, 1240300, Chile.
André AntunesState Key Laboratory of Lunar and Planetary Sciences, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau SAR, China.
Amanda Gonçalves BendiaInstituto Oceanográfico, Departamento de Oceanografia Biológica, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-120, Brazil.
Paris LavinDepartamento de Biotecnología, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Recursos Biológicos, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta, 1240300, Chile.
Marcelo González-AravenaDepartamento Científico, Instituto Antártico Chileno (INACH), Punta Arenas, Chile.
Rajesh Kumar SaniDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, South Dakota Mines, Rapid City, SD, USA.
Aparna BanerjeeFunctional Polysaccharides Research Group, Instituto de Ciencias Aplicadas, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca, 3467987, Chile. aparna.banerjee@uautonoma.cl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antarctica, a seemingly barren and icy wilderness, is home to a diverse array of microbial life that plays a critical role in sustaining its ecosystems. These resilient microorganisms drive nutrient cycling and carbon sequestration, but their function in global processes remains unclear. This pristine environment faces mounting threats from human activities, climate change, and increasing tourism. Contaminants, non-native species, and microplastics are increasingly reaching even the most remote regions, disrupting delicate microbial communities existing for millions of years. Antarctic microorganisms are not only ecologically significant but also valuable for biotechnological advancements, making their conservation imperative. Climate change exacerbates these threats, altering microbial habitats and promoting shifts in community structure. Tourism growth, though beneficial for education and economic reasons, poses significant challenges through biological and chemical contamination. Despite efforts under the Antarctic Treaty System to protect the region, there is a critical need for enhanced measures specifically targeting microbial conservation. This article underscores the importance of conserving Antarctic microbial diversity. It highlights the intricate microbial ecosystems and the urgency of implementing strategies such as stringent biosecurity measures, sustainable tourism practices, and comprehensive monitoring programs. Additionally, fostering international collaboration and research initiatives is vital for understanding and designing strategies to mitigate the impacts of environmental changes on microbial life. By prioritizing microbial conservation in policy frameworks and strengthening global cooperation, we can safeguard these unique ecosystems and ensure their resilience for future generations.

Identifiers

PMID40038369
PMCPMC11880430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.