ArticleScientific reports2025
Conspecific presence facilitates 22-kHz ultrasonic calls in male rats exposed to cat odor.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rats (Rattus norvegicus) exhibit defensive behaviors such as hiding, freezing, and fleeing when confronted with predators. They also may emit long-duration, flat frequency (~ 22-kHz), ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) in response to predator detection. These are in contrast to the shorter, higher frequency (~ 50-kHz), frequency modulated USVs often associated with positive affective states. Long duration ~ 22-kHz vocalizations can trigger defensive behaviors in other rats. Here, we studied the impact of a predator-associated stimulus (cat fur) and the context in which it was experienced on these ~ 22-kHz and ~ 50-kHz USVs in laboratory rats, along with how the presence of conspecifics (none, one, or two familiar rats) influenced these vocalizations. Group-housed rats were habituated to a testing arena with a hide box alone or in pairs or trios. The next day, they were exposed to cat fur (1 g) in the arena, and defensive behaviors and USVs were recorded. Subsequently, the rats returned to the arena without cat fur to assess contextual fear. Cat fur prompted significant hiding and ~ 22-kHz USVs, especially in social groups. However, ~ 22-kHz USVs were not elicited by the context alone in any social grouping. Cat fur also suppressed ~ 50-kHz USVs, with recovery faster in trios, indicating a social buffering effect. These findings suggest that predator cues induce ~ 22-kHz USVs that are influenced by social context, perhaps indicating an altruistic communicative function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.