ArticleScientific reports2025
Prevalence and impact of fertility preservation among young women with breast cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fertility Preservation Pathways in Young Women With Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Analysis in a Publicly Funded System.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- The experience of fertility preservation decision-making in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- The role of patient age in fertility preservation among women with breast cancer: biological mechanisms and clinical implications.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Review
- Achieving Pregnancy After Early Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Recent Evidence and Clinical Considerations.Cancers · 2026Review
- Article
- Impact of Cancer on Pregnancy and Fertility Service Use in Reproductive-Aged Women.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To observe the current situation of fertility preservation among female breast cancer patients ≤ 40 years old and analyze the related factors which influence the utilization of fertility preservation. A single-center retrospective questionnaire was conducted investigating patients diagnosed with breast cancer attending The First Affiliated Hospital of Xian JiaoTong University between January 2016 and December 2019. The questionnaire was redesigned based on previous similar research and the questions needed in this study. Rates of utilization of preservation services were compared based on patients' demographic and economic-social information, disease characteristic information and fertility related information. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between utilization of fertility preservation and sociodemographic factors, previous reproductive-related problems. 313 patients were successfully interviewed. 60/313patients (19.2%) had utilized fertility preservation. Younger patients (< 30 years of age), patients with 1 or no child, and patients had higher education level were more likely to pursue fertility preservation than their matched counterparts. Age, parity, and education level of breast cancer patients may impact rates of fertility preservation among reproductive age women diagnosed with breast cancer. Thus, further attention to age difference and patient's desire for future fertility could help to improve gaps in fertility preservation. These findings have guidance for counseling young breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.