ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluating the spatial pattern of water quality of the Nile River, Egypt, through multivariate analysis of chemical and biological indicators.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trace minerals, antioxidant defense, and safe consumption of Nile tilapia: insights from ecological variability in lake Mariout, Egypt.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Assessment of Heavy Metal Contamination in Water, Soils, and Fish Tissues from Barandu River, Buner, Pakistan: Implications for Food Safety and Human Health Risk.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- Assessment of industrial pollution and water quality in the Nile River using GIS-based indices at Aswan, Egypt.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development of a magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer for the removal of dexamethasone from river nile water.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Nile River, known as the "giver of life," serves as Egypt's main source of fresh water. A total of 28 sites along the Nile River were selected during the winter and summer of 2022 to illustrate spatial-temporal variation and indicate potential sources of pollution. The study showed that all chemical and physical parameters are within permissible limits. Based on the abiotic parameters, discriminant analysis (DA) classified the collected Nile sites into three groups (A, B, and C). Group A included the southern sites characterized by high transparency and low levels of electrical conductivity (EC), pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), biological oxygen demand (BOD), and chemical oxygen demand (COD). Group B included the middle sites and was characterized by the relatively high means of EC, total dissolved solid (TDS), pH, DO, BOD, and COD. Group C included the northern sites, which are characterized by low transparency and the highest value of nutrients and EC. A total of 113 phytoplankton species belonging to seven phyla were recorded, while a total of 52 zooplankton species were recorded. The lowest abundance and diversity of phytoplankton and zooplankton were detected at the southern sites, which increased gradually to attain the highest density and diversity in the northern sites. The submerged macrophyte species were recorded in the study area with low species diversity, and Myriophyllum spicatum was the dominant one. 98 epiphytic diatoms and 30 species of macroinvertebrates attached to macrophytes were recorded. The blood parameters of Oreochromis niloticus were within normal limits except for those collected from the Greater Cairo governorate sites in the north. The study showed an improvement in Nile water quality due to increased water levels and water discharged into the Nile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.