ArticleScientific reports2025
Opportunistic access control scheme for enhancing IoT-enabled healthcare security using blockchain and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Designing a secure anonymous group-oriented key agreement protocol for the internet of medical things.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Secured framework for IoT based healthcare application.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Scalable privacy-preserving data analytics for IoMT via FHE and zk-SNARK-enabled edge aggregation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Secure blockchain integrated deep learning framework for federated risk-adaptive and privacy-preserving IoT edge intelligence sets.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Quantum-resilient and adaptive multi-region data aggregation for IoMT using zero-knowledge proofs and edge intelligence.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Formalizing Permission to Delegate and Delegation with Policy Interaction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The healthcare industry, aided by technology, leverages the Internet of Things (IoT) paradigm to offer patient/user-related services that are ubiquitous and personalized. The authorized repository stores ubiquitous data for which access-level securities are granted. These security measures ensure that only authorized entities can access patient/user health information, preventing unauthorized entries and data downloads. However, recent sophisticated security and privacy attacks such as data breaches, data integrity issues, and data collusion have raised concerns in the healthcare industry. As healthcare data grows, conventional solutions often fail due to scalability concerns, causing inefficiencies and delays. This is especially true for multi-key authentication. Dependence on conventional access control systems leads to security flaws and authorization errors caused by static user behaviour models. This article introduces an Opportunistic Access Control Scheme (OACS) for leveraging access-level security. This approach is a defendable access control scheme in which the user permissions are based on their requirement and data. After accessing the healthcare record, a centralized IoT security augmentation and assessment is provided. The blockchain records determine and revoke the access grant based on previous access and delegation sequences. This scheme analyses the possible delegation methods for providing precise users with interrupt-free healthcare record access. The blockchain recommendations are analyzed using a trained learning paradigm to provide further access and denials. The proposed method reduces false rates by 11.74%, increases access rates by 13.1%, speeds up access and processing by 12.36% and 13.23%, respectively, and reduces failure rates by 9.94%. The OACS decreases false rates by 10.64%, processing time by 15.62%, and failure rates by 10.95%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.