ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparison of monovision surgery using ICL V4c or femtosecond laser LASIK for myopia correction in the presbyopia age patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparative study on the influence of age-specific ocular anatomical differences on the prediction of post-ICL surgery vault.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Visual outcomes of implantable Collamer lens and laser-assistedInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To compare the long-term outcomes of monovision surgery using implantable collamer lens (ICL) V4c and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) in myopic patients with early presbyopia. This case series study included 48 eyes of 24 patients (male/female: 10/14, mean age 45.50 ± 3.82 years) and followed-up for 4.5 years (54.00 ± 9.77 months). Patients were examined for spherical equivalent, uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, intraocular pressure, presbyopic add power, visual acuity (VA) (logMAR) of dominant eyes (D-eye), non-dominant eyes (nD-eye), and both eyes (Bi) at 0.4 m, 0.8 m, and 5 m, corneal wavefront aberration, and contrast sensitivity (CS). All surgeries were uneventful. The safety indices of ICL V4c group and FS-LASIK group were 1.17 ± 0.30 and 0.98 ± 0.20 (p < 0.05), and the efficacy indices were 0.79 ± 0.07 and 0.52 ± 0.07 (p < 0.05) respectively. The binocular VA (logMAR) of ICL V4c group and FS-LASIK group at 5.0 m were: 0.02 ± 0.11, 0.18 ± 0.30; 0.8 m: 0.09 ± 0.12, - 0.01 ± 0.11; 0.4 m: - 0.02 ± 0.06, - 0.03 ± 0.08, (p > 0.05 at three distances). Compared with ICL V4c group, lower CS was observed at 1.0 cpd in the FS-LASIK group (1.07 ± 0.31 vs. 0.80 ± 0.51, p = 0.043). Monovision surgery using ICL V4c and FS-LASIK provides good binocular visual acuity at near-to-far distances in myopia patients in the presbyopia age group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.