ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning aided UV absorbance spectroscopy for microbial contamination in cell therapy products.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We demonstrate the feasibility of machine-learning aided UV absorbance spectroscopy for in-process microbial contamination detection during cell therapy product (CTP) manufacturing. This method leverages a one-class support vector machine to analyse the absorbance spectra of cell cultures and predict if a sample is sterile or contaminated. This label-free technique provides a rapid output (< 30 minutes) with minimal sample preparation and volume (< 1 mL). Spiking of 7 microbial organisms into mesenchymal stromal cells supernatant aliquots from 6 commercial donors showed that contamination events could be detected at low inoculums of 10 CFUs with mean true positive and negative rates of 92.7% and 77.7% respectively. The true negative rate further improved to 92% after excluding samples from a single donor with anomalously high nicotinic acid. In cells spiked with 10 CFUs of E. coli, contamination was detected at the 21-hour timepoint, demonstrating comparable sensitivity to compendial USP < 71 > test (~ 24 hours). We hypothesize that spectral differences between nicotinic acid and nicotinamide in the UV region are the underlying mechanisms for contamination detection. This approach can be deployed as a preliminary test during different CTP manufacturing stages, for real-time, continuous culture monitoring enabling early detection of microbial contamination, assuring safety of CTP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.