ArticleScientific reports2025
Breast cancer prediction based on gene expression data using interpretable machine learning techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Predicting adverse prognostic outcomes in hospitalized breast cancer patients: development and validation of a risk model.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- A machine learning integrated multi-omics framework for risk prediction and target discovery in insomnia aggravated sepsis induced acute lung injury.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Liquid Biopsy and Multi-Omic Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: Innovations in Early Detection, Therapy Guidance, and Disease Monitoring.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Review
- Machine Learning Models for Predicting Gynecological Cancers: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a global health burden, with an increase in deaths related to this particular cancer. Accurately predicting and diagnosing breast cancer is important for treatment development and survival of patients. This study aimed to accurately predict breast cancer using a dataset comprising 1208 observations and 3602 genes. The study employed feature selection techniques to identify the most influential predictive genes for breast cancer using machine learning (ML) models. The study used K-nearest Neighbors (KNN), random forests (RF), and a support vector machine (SVM). Furthermore, the study employed feature- and model-based importance and explainable ML methods, including Shapley values, Partial dependency (PDPS), and Accumulated Local Effects (ALE) plots, to explain the genes' importance ranking from the ML methods. Shapley values highlighted the significance of some of the genes in predicting cancer presence. Model-based feature ranking techniques, particularly the Leaving-One-Covariate-In (LOCI) method, identified the ten most critical genes for predicting tumor cases. The LOCI rankings from the SVM and RF methods were aligned. Additionally, visualization methods such as PDPS and ALE plots demonstrated how individual feature changes affect predictions and interactions with other genes. By combining feature selection techniques and explainable ML methods, this study has demonstrated the interpretability and reliability of machine learning models for breast cancer prediction, emphasizing the importance of incorporating explainable ML approaches for medical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.