Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038307›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Breast cancer prediction based on gene expression data using interpretable machine learning techniques.

Gabriel Kallah-Dagadu, Mohanad Mohammed, Justine B Nasejje, Nobuhle Nokubonga Mchunu, Halima S Twabi, Jesca Mercy Batidzirai, Geoffrey Chiyuzga Singini, Portia Nevhungoni, Innocent Maposa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gabriel Kallah-DagaduDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Mohanad MohammedSchool of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Justine B NasejjeSchool of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg-Braamfontein, South Africa.
Nobuhle Nokubonga MchunuBiostatistics Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africa.
Halima S TwabiDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi.
Jesca Mercy BatidziraiSchool of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Geoffrey Chiyuzga SinginiDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi.
Portia NevhungoniBiostatistics Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Innocent MaposaDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, Cape Town, South Africa. imaposa@sun.ac.za.

Funding

Research Training on Harnessing Data Science for Global Health Priorities in AfricaU2RTW012140 · FIC · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI BARNIGHAUSEN, TILL, FAWZI, WAFAIE W · 2021 to 2025
$1.7M
FIC NIH HHS U2R TW012140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer remains a global health burden, with an increase in deaths related to this particular cancer. Accurately predicting and diagnosing breast cancer is important for treatment development and survival of patients. This study aimed to accurately predict breast cancer using a dataset comprising 1208 observations and 3602 genes. The study employed feature selection techniques to identify the most influential predictive genes for breast cancer using machine learning (ML) models. The study used K-nearest Neighbors (KNN), random forests (RF), and a support vector machine (SVM). Furthermore, the study employed feature- and model-based importance and explainable ML methods, including Shapley values, Partial dependency (PDPS), and Accumulated Local Effects (ALE) plots, to explain the genes' importance ranking from the ML methods. Shapley values highlighted the significance of some of the genes in predicting cancer presence. Model-based feature ranking techniques, particularly the Leaving-One-Covariate-In (LOCI) method, identified the ten most critical genes for predicting tumor cases. The LOCI rankings from the SVM and RF methods were aligned. Additionally, visualization methods such as PDPS and ALE plots demonstrated how individual feature changes affect predictions and interactions with other genes. By combining feature selection techniques and explainable ML methods, this study has demonstrated the interpretability and reliability of machine learning models for breast cancer prediction, emphasizing the importance of incorporating explainable ML approaches for medical decision-making.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticMachine LearningComputational BiologyFemaleHumansSupport Vector MachineBreast cancerInterpretable machine learningMachine learningPrediction

Identifiers

PMID40038307
PMCPMC11880515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.