Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038284›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Functional optic tract rewiring via subtype- and target-specific axonal regeneration and presynaptic activity enhancement.

Xin Zhang, Chao Yang, Chengle Zhang, Junqiang Wu, Xiang Zhang, Jiayang Gao, Xuejie Wang, Leung Ting Chan, Yiren Zhou, Yujun Chen and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Xin Zhang *Division of Life Science, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Chao Yang *Division of Life Science, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1109-5407
Chengle Zhang *Division of Life Science, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7307-4938
Junqiang WuDivision of Life Science, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Xiang ZhangDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Jiayang GaoSchool of Life Sciences, Centre for Cell & Developmental Biology and State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Sha Tin, China.
Xuejie WangDivision of Life Science, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Leung Ting ChanDivision of Life Science, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Yiren ZhouDivision of Life Science, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Yujun ChenDivision of Life Science, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3539-0403
Sindy Sing Ting TamDivision of Life Science, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6805-8514
Shuhang ChenHong Kong Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hong Kong, China.
Yuqian MaHefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, CAS Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Biomedical Sciences and Health Laboratory of Anhui Province, School of Life Sciences, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1317-7297
Wing-Ho YungDepartment of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Liting DuanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Sha Tin, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8978-8890
Liwen JiangSchool of Life Sciences, Centre for Cell & Developmental Biology and State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Sha Tin, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7829-1472
Yiwen WangDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Kai LiuDivision of Life Science, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China. kailiu@ust.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9351-1640

Funding

Innovation and Technology Commission (ITF) ITCPD/17-9National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82171384Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) 16102524Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) AoE/M-604/16Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) C4001-22YResearch Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) C4002-21EFResearch Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) C4014-23GResearch Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) C6034-21GResearch Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) CRS_CUHK405/23Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) JLFS/M-604/24Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) PDFS2223-6S04Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) T13-602/21N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanisms underlying functional axonal rewiring after adult mammalian central nervous system (CNS) injuries remain unclear partially due to limited models. Here we develop a mouse intracranial pre-olivary pretectal nucleus (OPN) optic tract injury model and demonstrate that Pten/Socs3 knockout and CNTF expression in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) promotes optic tract regeneration and OPN reinnervation. Revealed by transmission electron microscopy, trans-synaptic labeling, and electrophysiology, functional synapses are formed in OPN mainly by intrinsically photosensitive RGCs, thereby partially restoring the pupillary light reflex (PLR). Moreover, combining with Lipin1 knockdown accelerates the recovery and achieves functional reconnection after chronic injury. PLR can be further boosted by increasing RGC photosensitivity with melanopsin overexpression, and it can also be enhanced by treatment of a voltage-gated calcium channel modulator to augment presynaptic release. These findings highlight the importance of neuronal types and presynaptic activity for functional reconnection after CNS injuries.

Indexed as

AxonsNerve RegenerationVisual PathwaysAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMaleMelanopsinMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutOptic Nerve InjuriesPresynaptic TerminalsPTEN PhosphohydrolaseReflex, PupillaryRetinal Ganglion CellsRod OpsinsMelanopsinPTEN PhosphohydrolasePten protein, mouseRod Opsins

Identifiers

PMID40038284
PMCPMC11880380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.