ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2025
The Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Adolescent Patients.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of a novel absorbable bone wax as a hemostatic agent for periacetabular osteotomy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Trial
- Perioperative Management of Patients Undergoing Periacetabular Osteotomy: An Evidence-Based Review.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
- Residual Acetabular Dysplasia in Young Children: a Comprehensive Review of Diagnosis and Management.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
- Caregivers' care experiences of children with developmental dislocation of the hip in Tibet, China: a convergent mixed-methods study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- MRI-based cartilaginous acetabular coverage after open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip: association with hip function and a potential compensatory role in residual dysplasia.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewAdolescent hip dysplasia represents a unique challenge for pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. The disease spectrum is broad and the complications of untreated disease can be severe. The purpose of this review is to provide a framework for understanding and treating adolescent hip dysplasia and when to consider nonoperative versus operative interventions. RECENT
findingsCombined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy may be considered for patients with concomitant symptomatic labral tears, which is often diagnosed by history and advanced imaging. Hip dysplasia in adolescent patients is an important diagnosis. There are various clinical and radiographic parameters and the most important ones are lateral center edge angle, Tonnis grade, and joint congruency. Management is based on symptoms and radiographic findings. Nonoperative management is typically recommended for patients with symptomatic borderline dysplasia. Surgical management includes periacetabular osteotomy for patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia that have failed nonoperative treatment. Concomitant hip arthroscopy may be considered for patients with symptomatic labral tear, but is generally not recommended in isolation if there is evidence of dysplasia. Outcomes are generally good after operative management of hip dysplasia in adolescent patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.