ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
Trochanteric hip fractures with subtrochanteric extension. Does the cephalomedullary nail length matter?
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of intramedullary nail length on the biomechanical performance of internal fixation for subtrochanteric femoral fractures.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Consensus-based guidelines on subtrochanteric femur fractures: Bridging evidence and experience on 11 key clinical dilemmas.SICOT-J · 2025Article
- Short Versus Long Nails in Treating Subtrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Complication Rates.JB & JS open accessReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionShort or standard nails are widely accepted as the treatment of choice for unstable intertrochanteric fractures, while long nails are preferred for the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures. There is no consensus on the optimal implant length for peri/intertrochanteric fractures with subtrochanteric extension. Determining whether to opt for a standard or a long intramedullary nail (IMN) is often unclear and tends to be subjective. The aim of this study was to compare functional outcomes before and 1 year after the surgical fixation of trochanteric fractures with subtrochanteric extension, reoperation rates, 1-year mortality rates, surgical time, blood loss, quality of fracture reduction, and tip-apex distance (TAD) in patients treated with either standard or long cephalomedullary nails. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using our Institutional Fragility Hip Fracture Registry. All patients over 65 years old who underwent hip surgery due to an intertrochanteric fracture with subtrochanteric extension > 2 cm from the lesser trochanter between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021, were included. Patients were divided based on the length of the cephalomedullary nails used to treat the trochanteric fractures (standard vs. long nails).
resultsCompeting risk analyses showed significant differences in the subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) for PMS reduction in the unadjusted SHR = 0.37 (95% CI 0.15, 0.88) and adjusted SHR = 0.4 (95% CI 0.17, 0.94) in favor of the long nail group. No differences were detected in 1-year mortality rates, which were 16.29%. There were also no differences in TAD, reoperations, quality of reduction, or blood loss, although surgical time was longer for the long nail group.
conclusionOf 1533 peri-intertrochanteric fractures, 11.6% exhibited subtrochanteric extension of more than 2 cm. While long nails demonstrated advantages in PMS reduction and fracture extension management, standard nails had the advantage of reducing surgical time. Both standard and long nails exhibited comparable outcomes in terms of mortality, surgical complications, and hematological parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40038205What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.