Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038183›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025

Enhancing visual perception: The independent and additive effects of temporal and feature-based attention.

Dan Huang, Feng Gao, Yao Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dan HuangSchool of Automation and Electronic Information, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Sichuan, 643000, China. danhuang81@suse.edu.cn.
Feng GaoSchool of Automation and Electronic Information, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Sichuan, 643000, China.
Yao ChenSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.

Funding

Key Research and Development Program of Sichuan Province 2022YFSY0056National Natural Science Foundation of China 31471081National Natural Science Foundation of China 61773259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers often study selective attention in the temporal domain in isolation, but in real-life situations, it typically works together with other types of attention. The interplay between temporal attention (focusing on when) and feature-based attention (focusing on what) is one important aspect of attention that remains poorly understood. To investigate this, we asked subjects to report the orientation of one of the two stimuli sequentially presented at the same position. We used a cue consisting of two arrows to manipulate both temporal and feature-based attention: arrow size conveyed timing information, while direction conveyed orientation information of the upcoming target. This design effectively elicited temporal and feature-based attention to comparable extents, allowing us to examine their isolated and combined effects on perceptual sensitivity systematically. We observed that perceptual sensitivity was significantly influenced by the accuracy of the cue in predicting either target features or timing. When both aspects of the cue were accurate, perceptual sensitivity was maximized. Conversely, when both predictions were incorrect, perceptual sensitivity was minimized. When only one aspect of the cue was accurate, perceptual sensitivity showed an intermediate level. Crucially, our findings demonstrate that temporal and feature-based attention independently and additively affect perceptual sensitivity, suggesting that these attentional mechanisms operate autonomously and in concert to shape visual perception.

Indexed as

AttentionTime PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultFeature-based attentionPsychophysicsTemporal attentionVisual perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.