Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038161›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2025

Considerations for Regulatory Reusability of Dynamic Tools in the New Drug Development.

Jiang Liu, Yuching Yang, Joga Gobburu, Cynthia J Musante, Martin Klein, Liang Zhao, Rajanikanth Madabushi, Hao Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Advancing drug development with "Fit-for-Purpose" modeling informed approaches.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiang LiuOffice of Clinical Pharmacology (OCP), Office of Translational Sciences (OTS), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.
Yuching YangOffice of Clinical Pharmacology (OCP), Office of Translational Sciences (OTS), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.
Joga GobburuUniversity of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Cynthia J MusanteTranslational Clinical Sciences, Pfizer Research and Development, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Martin KleinDivision of Biometrics VIII, Office of Biostatistics, OTS, CDER, FDA, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Liang ZhaoDivision of Quantitative Methods and Modeling, Office of Research and Standards (ORS), Office of Generic Drugs (OGD), CDER, FDA, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Rajanikanth MadabushiOffice of Clinical Pharmacology (OCP), Office of Translational Sciences (OTS), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.
Hao ZhuOffice of Clinical Pharmacology (OCP), Office of Translational Sciences (OTS), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA. hao.zhu@fda.hhs.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3858-2048

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Model-informed drug development (MIDD) approaches have become indispensable for new drug development and to address regulatory challenges. Dynamic tools, such as population pharmacokinetics (popPK), physiologically-based pharmacokinetics (PBPK), and quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) models, are routinely employed to enhance the efficiency of drug development. Recently, the Fit-for-Purpose (FFP) initiative and the Model Master File (MMF) framework have emerged to support model reusability and sharing in regulatory settings. In this manuscript we share key insights from the Session "Pathways for Regulatory Acceptance of Dynamic Tools in the New Drug Space" of Workshop "Considerations and Potential Regulatory Applications for a Model Master File", hosted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Center for Research on Complex Generics (CRCG) and discuss the considerations for regulatory acceptance of dynamic modeling tools. Presentations at the workshop explored current practices in PBPK model evaluation, the potential for popPK models in bioequivalence (BE) assessments, and the implications of reusing models. Challenges such as context-specific validation, version control, and the impact of scientific and technological advancements on model reuse were emphasized. The workshop underscored the importance of clear regulatory pathways and structured frameworks for the consistent application of reusable models. The MMF's potential to streamline reviews and reduce redundancies was noted, although operational details require further elaboration. Continued collaboration among stakeholders is essential to refine model-sharing practices, enhance model validation processes, and promote transparency, ensuring that MIDD approaches remain robust and adaptable to evolving regulatory needs.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentModels, BiologicalDrug ApprovalDrugs, GenericHumansPharmacokineticsTherapeutic EquivalencyUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationDrugs, Genericmodelingreusabilitysimulationworkshop report

Identifiers

PMID40038161
PMCPMC12158829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.