ArticlePharmaceutical research2025
Considerations for Regulatory Reusability of Dynamic Tools in the New Drug Development.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing drug development with "Fit-for-Purpose" modeling informed approaches.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Model-informed drug development (MIDD) approaches have become indispensable for new drug development and to address regulatory challenges. Dynamic tools, such as population pharmacokinetics (popPK), physiologically-based pharmacokinetics (PBPK), and quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) models, are routinely employed to enhance the efficiency of drug development. Recently, the Fit-for-Purpose (FFP) initiative and the Model Master File (MMF) framework have emerged to support model reusability and sharing in regulatory settings. In this manuscript we share key insights from the Session "Pathways for Regulatory Acceptance of Dynamic Tools in the New Drug Space" of Workshop "Considerations and Potential Regulatory Applications for a Model Master File", hosted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Center for Research on Complex Generics (CRCG) and discuss the considerations for regulatory acceptance of dynamic modeling tools. Presentations at the workshop explored current practices in PBPK model evaluation, the potential for popPK models in bioequivalence (BE) assessments, and the implications of reusing models. Challenges such as context-specific validation, version control, and the impact of scientific and technological advancements on model reuse were emphasized. The workshop underscored the importance of clear regulatory pathways and structured frameworks for the consistent application of reusable models. The MMF's potential to streamline reviews and reduce redundancies was noted, although operational details require further elaboration. Continued collaboration among stakeholders is essential to refine model-sharing practices, enhance model validation processes, and promote transparency, ensuring that MIDD approaches remain robust and adaptable to evolving regulatory needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.