Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038146›Full record

ArticleOecologia2025

Adaptive divergence in diets between the sexes in a tropical snake (Stegonotus australis, Colubridae).

Gregory P Brown, Thomas Madsen, Richard Shine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gregory P BrownSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia. greg.brown@mq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2924-9040
Thomas MadsenSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Victoria, 3217, Australia.
Richard ShineSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council FT120100095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Males and females within a population may differ in dietary composition either as a non-adaptive consequence of sexual dimorphism, or because specific food types enhance fitness more in one sex than the other. To test between those two explanations, we can ask whether the consumption of a food type (a) is constrained by sexually dimorphic traits such as body size, or (b) differentially benefits the sex that consumes that food more frequently. A 23-year field study of Slatey-Grey Snakes (Stegonotus australis) in tropical Australia provided data on 663 meals, of which 130 were reptile eggs (primarily from Keelback Snakes (Tropidonophis mairii)). Over the same range of snake SVLs, eggs were consumed more often by female than by male Slatey-Grey Snakes (25.8 versus 15.2% of records), but consumption of reptile eggs was independent of snake body size. Female Slatey-Grey Snakes were not more common or more active than males during Keelback nesting periods, but they were more likely to be captured in the vicinity of Keelback oviposition sites than were males. In years with higher availability of Keelback eggs, female Slatey-Grey Snakes had higher clutch sizes and clutch masses (plausibly reflecting the nutritional benefits of eating reptile eggs to provision reptile eggs). In combination, our results suggest an adaptive basis to the sex-based divergence in dietary composition in Slatey-Grey Snakes.

Indexed as

ColubridaeDietAnimalsBody SizeFemaleMaleSex CharacteristicsSnakesOophagySexual dimorphismStegonotus cucullatusTrophic nicheTropidonophis mairii

Identifiers

PMID40038146
PMCPMC11880039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.