ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2025
Two-step pragmatic subgroup discovery for heterogeneous treatment effects analyses: perspectives toward enhanced interpretability.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bayesian Causal Methods for Environmental Accountability Studies with Heterogeneous Effects.Current environmental health reports · 2026Review
- The Look AHEAD Research Program: A 25-Year Retrospective From the Perspective of Geroscience.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- Estimating and discovering heterogeneous treatment effects using machine learning in epidemiological studies: a practical guide.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effect heterogeneity analyses using causal machine learning algorithms have gained popularity in recent years. However, the interpretation of estimated individualized effects requires caution because insights from these data-driven approaches might be misaligned with the contextual needs of a human audience. Thus, a practical framework that integrates advanced machine learning methods and decision-making remains critically needed to achieve effective implementation and scientific communication. We introduce a 2-step framework to identify characteristics associated with substantial effect heterogeneity in a practically relevant format. The proposed framework applies distinct sets of covariates for (i) estimation of individualized effects and (ii) subgroup discovery and shows the subgroups with heterogeneity based on highly interpretable if-then rules. By referring to existing metrics of interpretability, we describe how each step contributes to leveraging a theoretical advantage of machine learning models while creating an interpretable and practically relevant framework. We applied the pragmatic subgroup discovery framework for the Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) trial to assess practically relevant and comprehensive insights into the effect heterogeneities of intense lifestyle intervention for individuals with diabetes on cardiovascular mortality. Our analysis identified (i) individuals with history of cardiovascular disease and myocardial infarction had the least benefit from the intervention, while (ii) individuals with no history of cardiovascular diseases and HbA1c < 7% received the highest benefit. In summary, our practical framework for heterogeneous effects discovery could be a generic strategy to ensure both effective implementation and scientific communication when applying machine learning algorithms in epidemiological research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.