Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038137›Full record

SynthesisJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Landscape of 2D Deep Learning Segmentation Networks Applied to CT Scan from Lung Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.

Somayeh Sadat Mehrnia, Zhino Safahi, Amin Mousavi, Fatemeh Panahandeh, Arezoo Farmani, Ren Yuan, Arman Rahmim, Mohammad R Salmanpour

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tumor-SAM: Segment Anything Model for Semi-automatic Lung Tumor Segmentation in CT.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Somayeh Sadat MehrniaDepartment of Integrative Oncology, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Zhino SafahiTechnological Virtual Collaboration (TECVICO Corp.), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Amin MousaviTechnological Virtual Collaboration (TECVICO Corp.), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Fatemeh PanahandehTechnological Virtual Collaboration (TECVICO Corp.), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Arezoo FarmaniTechnological Virtual Collaboration (TECVICO Corp.), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ren YuanDepartment of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Arman RahmimDepartment of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Mohammad R SalmanpourTechnological Virtual Collaboration (TECVICO Corp.), Vancouver, BC, Canada. msalman@bccrc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9515-789X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing rates of lung cancer emphasize the need for early detection through computed tomography (CT) scans, enhanced by deep learning (DL) to improve diagnosis, treatment, and patient survival. This review examines current and prospective applications of 2D- DL networks in lung cancer CT segmentation, summarizing research, highlighting essential concepts and gaps; Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, a systematic search of peer-reviewed studies from 01/2020 to 12/2024 on data-driven population segmentation using structured data was conducted across databases like Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) and ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) library. 124 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed.

resultsThe LIDC-LIDR dataset was the most frequently used; The finding particularly relies on supervised learning with labeled data. The UNet model and its variants were the most frequently used models in medical image segmentation, achieving Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC) of up to 0.9999. The reviewed studies primarily exhibit significant gaps in addressing class imbalances (67%), underuse of cross-validation (21%), and poor model stability evaluations (3%). Additionally, 88% failed to address the missing data, and generalizability concerns were only discussed in 34% of cases.

conclusionsThe review emphasizes the importance of Convolutional Neural Networks, particularly UNet, in lung CT analysis and advocates for a combined 2D/3D modeling approach. It also highlights the need for larger, diverse datasets and the exploration of semi-supervised and unsupervised learning to enhance automated lung cancer diagnosis and early detection.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLung NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumans2D SegmentationComputed TomographyDeep LearningLung CancerReview Article

Identifiers

PMID40038137
PMCPMC12701165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.