Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038129›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Proactive symptom monitoring to initiate timely palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Grace Meijuan Yang, Yu Ke, Xin Hui Ng, Patricia Soek Hui Neo, Yin Bun Cheung

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04242251 nacompletednot on this map

Novel Palliative Care Model for Advanced Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Centre, SingaporeRan2021 to 2024Enrolled239ConditionsCancerArmsSPARKLE Model of care
NCT07745816 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness and Implementation of 'Supportive and Palliative cAre Review Kit in Locations Everywhere' (SPARKLE-2) - A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Centre, SingaporeRan2026 to 2029Enrolled300ConditionsNeoplasms, Palliative CareArmsSPARKLE-2
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Grace Meijuan YangDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore. Grace.yang.m.j@singhealth.com.sg.
Yu KeDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
Xin Hui NgDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
Patricia Soek Hui NeoDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
Yin Bun CheungProgramme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

National Medical Research Council MOH-000336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo deliver timely palliative care in response to supportive and palliative care needs as they arise, we developed a model called "Supportive and Palliative care Review Kit in Locations Everywhere" (SPARKLE), which comprises regular remote symptom monitoring using the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS); early identification and prompt treatment of palliative care symptoms and concerns identified; and referral to specialist palliative care if follow-up is required.

methodsA prospective randomized controlled trial of SPARKLE versus usual care was conducted among patients with advanced cancers. The primary endpoint was Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scores at 16 weeks post randomization.

resultsA total of 239 patients were randomized-119 patients to usual care and 120 patients to SPARKLE intervention. There was no significant difference in total FACT-G score (baseline-adjusted difference 0.8, 95% CI - 3.5 to 5.1, p = 0.73). Physical well-being was better in the SPARKLE intervention group compared to the usual care group (baseline-adjusted difference 1.9, 95%CI 0.4 to 3.4, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the other domain scores. There were no differences in palliative care referrals, occurrence of emergency department visits, or hospital admissions.

conclusionAlthough there was no significant difference in overall quality of life, better physical symptom control could have been achieved through proactive identification and treatment of symptoms and concerns by the SPARKLE nurse. Further studies are warranted to evaluate how various components of palliative care service models impact clinical outcomes.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04242251. Date of registration: 23 January 2020.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPalliative CareSymptom AssessmentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeReferral and ConsultationTime FactorsHospice and palliative care nursingNeoplasmsPalliative carePatient-reported outcome measureQuality of life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.