Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038123›Full record

ReviewCell and tissue banking2025

An insightful overview on osteogenic potential of nano hydroxyapatite for bone regeneration.

M Suba Sri, R Usha

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cell and tissue banking, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M Suba SriDepartment of Microbiology, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
R UshaDepartment of Microbiology, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. ushaanbu09@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The orthopaedic surgeries were greatly aided by bone grafting with the use of nanomaterials which provide new strategies for bone regeneration, despite the significant drawbacks of traditional treatments. Hydroxyapatite is one of the bioactive ceramics that has gained substantial research attention due to its biocompatibility, bioactivity and osteointegration ability for the manufacturing of nano bone grafts. The organized complex and porous structures of the human bone tissue is a nanocomposite which consists of both organic and inorganic matrix including hydroxyapatite naturally. Conventional hydroxyapatite was known to provide good adhesion and proliferation of host cells but very low mechanical strength. Hence biomaterial made of hydroxyapatite with various polymers and cross linking agents were used to enhance the mechanical strength of the material. Out of 293 articles obtained from the literature search, only 90 articles met the inclusion criteria about bone regeneration using nano hydroxyapatite materials. The present review addresses the potential capping agents with plant extracts for the synthesis of hydroxyapatite nanomaterials with multi-functional applications include drug delivery for targeting the desired therapeutic effect for bone regeneration with osteoprotective ability and tumour therapy.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationDurapatiteOsteogenesisAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsHumansBiocompatible MaterialsDurapatiteBone regenerationDrug deliveryHydroxyapatiteNanomaterialsTumor therapy and osteoprotection

Identifiers

PMID40038123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.