ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Predicting Cardiac Magnetic Resonance-Derived Ejection Fraction from Echocardiogram Via Deep Learning Approach in Tetralogy of Fallot.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systolic function assessment is essential in children with congenital heart disease. Traditional methods of echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) estimation might overestimate systolic function compared to the gold standard of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), especially in Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). Deep learning technologies such as EchoNet-Dynamic offer more consistent cardiac evaluations and can potentially accurately predict LVEF using echocardiographic videos. The EchoNet-Dynamic/EchoNet-Peds models predict LVEF using echocardiograms with expert-measured LVEF as the ground truth. Using a transfer learning approach, we fine-tuned this model to predict LVEF with CMR-derived LVEF as ground truth and TOF echocardiograms as input images. For echocardiograms in the PSAX view, the model predicted CMR LVEF with an R2 of 0.79 and an MAE of 4.41. For the A4C view, the model predicted CMR LVEF with an R2 of 0.53 and an MAE of 6.4. Plotted ROC curves indicate that both tuned models differentiated well between normal and reduced LVEF. This study shows the potential of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models in transforming the field of cardiac imaging interpretation via a hybrid approach using the CMR labels and echocardiogram videos offering advancements over conventional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40038120What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.