ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025
Elevated baseline CTX levels predict enhanced therapeutic efficacy of zoledronic acid in augmenting lumbar spine bone mineral density among Chinese osteoporosis patients.
Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined the link between baseline CTX levels and zoledronic acid's effectiveness in boosting bone density in osteoporosis patients. Among 472 Chinese patients, higher initial CTX levels correlated with greater lumbar spine bone density improvement after treatment. However, no such correlation was found for hip or femoral neck bones. This suggests CTX levels may aid in treatment selection for lumbar spine, though further research is needed. The findings have clinical implications for optimizing osteoporosis treatment. PURPOSE: To elucidate the correlation between baseline CTX levels and the therapeutic efficacy of zoledronic acid in augmenting bone mineral density (BMD) among individuals with osteoporosis.
methodsThis study studied patients diagnosed with primary osteoporosis who were hospitalized at least twice and received annual zoledronic acid therapy. Patients were stratified into three groups based on their initial CTX levels prior to zoledronic acid administration. ANOVA was employed to compare BMD alterations across the groups. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were utilized to analyze the relationship between baseline CTX levels and subsequent BMD changes post-zoledronic acid treatment. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 26.0.
resultsA total of 472 patients were evaluated and categorized into three cohorts according to their initial CTX levels, arranged in ascending order. Notably, group 3, characterized by the highest initial CTX levels, demonstrated a significantly more pronounced increase in lumbar spine BMD compared to the other two groups. Specifically, when group 1 served as the reference, group 3 exhibited a 0.4-unit elevation in lumbar spine T-score. Conversely, no discernible relationship was observed between baseline CTX levels and BMD changes in the hip or femoral neck following zoledronic acid treatment.
conclusionsOur findings among a Chinese population indicate that elevated CTX levels, particularly exceeding 0.480 ng/ml, are notably associated with enhanced therapeutic efficacy of zoledronic acid in boosting lumbar spine BMD. However, this correlation appears less robust with respect to improvements in hip and femoral neck BMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40038109What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.