ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Extending the PARCH Scale: Assessing Hydropathy of Proteins across Multiple Water Models.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lipid-Shell PARCH: A Physically Motivated Scale for Transmembrane Residue Hydropathy.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Article
- Hydropathy Landscapes of Histone-DNA Interactions in Chromatin Building Blocks.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Article
- Decoding the Post-translational Modification Crosstalk: Functional Implications of Phosphorylation, Acetylation, and Methylation.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Article
- Hydrophobicity in Intrinsically Disordered Protein Force Fields: Implications for Conformational Ensembles and Protein-Protein Interactions.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative assessment of amino acid hydropathy can be done using the protocol for assigning a residue's character on a hydropathy (PARCH) scale, which assigns values from 0 to 10, with lower values indicating greater hydrophobicity. The merit of the PARCH scale lies in its ability to integrate both the nanoscale topographical features and the chemical properties of amino acid residues when determining hydropathy. In its initial application, we employed the TIP3P water model, optimized for CHARMM36m proteins, to simulate the water behavior around the protein surface. Due to the growing use of the PARCH scale, we have extended its application to three additional all-atom water models: TIP4P, TIP4P-Ew, and TIP5P. Our findings reveal that although PARCH values vary across these water models, the relative hydropathy trends remain consistent. All models successfully distinguished hydrophobic from hydrophilic regions in nanoscale topography, although charged residues showed greater sensitivity to model choice, leading to more significant value variances. Additionally, we evaluated the influence of two other parameters─the force constant used to constrain proteins and the time step of the evaporation process─on the PARCH scale. Overall, the PARCH scale has demonstrated robustness in capturing protein hydropathy across various water models, suggesting its potential applicability with other protein-water force field combinations and even molecular systems beyond proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.