ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2025
Extending the reach of single-particle cryoEM.
Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laser phase plate improves structure determination of small proteins by cryo-EM.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Pulsed-electron illumination does not reduce beam damage for imaging biological macromolecules.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Bridging structure and function: artificial intelligence-based modelling of kidney proteins.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Applications and prospects of cryo-electron tomography in drug discovery and understanding disease.Current opinion in structural biology · 2026Review
- Membrane-Based Assembly and Interactions in Immune Receptors.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Hidden gems bring proteins into view.Nature chemical biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular structure determination using electron cryomicroscopy (cryoEM) is poised in early 2025 to surpass X-ray crystallography as the most used method for experimentally determining new structures. But the technique has not reached the physical limits set by radiation damage and the signal-to-noise ratio in individual images of molecules. By examining these limits and comparing the number and resolution of structures determined versus molecular weight, we identify opportunities for extending the application of single-particle cryoEM. This will help guide technology development to continue the exponential growth of structural biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.