Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40037920›Full record

ArticleBMJ open gastroenterology2025

Vision-language large learning model, GPT4V, accurately classifies the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score.

Daniel Yan Zheng Lim, Yu Bin Tan, Jonas Ren Yi Ho, Sushmitha Carkarine, Tian Wei Valerie Chew, Yuhe Ke, Jen Hong Tan, Ting Fang Tan, Kabilan Elangovan, Le Quan and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Daniel Yan Zheng Lim *Dept of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore limyzd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9715-6970
Yu Bin Tan *Dept of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4639-5760
Jonas Ren Yi HoDept of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2443-1748
Sushmitha CarkarineDept of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6324-3002
Tian Wei Valerie ChewDept of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3667-8714
Yuhe KeData Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Jen Hong TanData Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Ting Fang TanArtificial Intelligence Office, Singapore Health Services Pte Ltd, Singapore.
Kabilan ElangovanArtificial Intelligence Office, Singapore Health Services Pte Ltd, Singapore.
Le QuanData Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Li Yuan JinArtificial Intelligence Office, Singapore Health Services Pte Ltd, Singapore.
Jasmine Chiat Ling OngDivision of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Gerald Gui Ren SngData Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Joshua Yi Min TungData Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Chee Kiat TanDept of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6992-2319
Damien TanDept of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLarge learning models (LLMs) such as GPT are advanced artificial intelligence (AI) models. Originally developed for natural language processing, they have been adapted for multi-modal tasks with vision-language input. One clinically relevant task is scoring the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). While traditional AI techniques use large amounts of data for training, we hypothesise that vision-language LLM can perform this task with fewer examples.

methodsWe used the GPT4V vision-language LLM developed by OpenAI, via the OpenAI application programming interface. A standardised prompt instructed the model to grade BBPS with contextual references extracted from the original paper describing the BBPS by Lai

resultsOf 1794 images, GPT4V returned valid results for 1772 (98%). It had an accuracy of 0.84 for two-class classification (BBPS 0-1 vs 2-3) and 0.74 for four-class classification (BBPS 0, 1, 2, 3). Macro-averaged F1 scores were 0.81 and 0.63, respectively. Qualitatively, most errors arose from misclassification of BBPS 1 as 2. These results compare favourably with current methods using large amounts of training data, which achieve an accuracy in the range of 0.8-0.9.

conclusionThis study provides proof-of-concept that a vision-language LLM is able to perform BBPS classification accurately, without large training datasets. This represents a paradigm shift in AI classification methods in medicine, where many diseases lack sufficient data to train traditional AI models. An LLM with appropriate examples may be used in such cases.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningHumansNatural Language ProcessingCOLORECTAL CANCERCOLORECTAL CANCER SCREENINGENDOSCOPY

Identifiers

PMID40037920
PMCPMC11881179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.