Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40037915›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2025

Unhealthy food advertising on social media: policy lessons from the Australian Ad Observatory.

Tanita Northcott, Katherine Sievert, Cherie Russell, Abdul Obeid, Daniel Angus, Christine Parker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Length and Framing of Anti-Junk Food Ads Impact Inclinations to Consume Junk Food Among Normal Weight, Overweight, and Adults With Obesity.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tanita NorthcottFaculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia.
Katherine SievertFaculty of Health, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4617-8034
Cherie RussellFaculty of Health, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia.
Abdul ObeidDigital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology, 149 Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, Queensland 4059, Australia.
Daniel AngusDigital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology, 149 Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, Queensland 4059, Australia.
Christine ParkerMelbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, 185 Pelham St, Calrton, Victoria 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1870-5706

Funding

Australian Research Council CE200100005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization and public health experts are calling for urgent restrictions on the online marketing of unhealthy food. The harmful effects of exposure to advertising for 'unhealthy foods', including discretionary foods high in fat, salt or sugar, particularly for children, has prompted a proposed policy action in Australia to prohibit all online unhealthy food marketing. We used a novel data donation infrastructure, the Australian Ad Observatory, to create a dataset of 1703 ads promoting top-selling unhealthy food brands that had been placed by 141 different advertisers on 367 individual Australians' Facebook feeds. We used this dataset to identify any targeting of unhealthy food ads towards young people (18-24), investigate harmful marketing practices by four of the top advertisers (KFC, McDonald's, Cadbury and 7-Eleven); and demonstrate how online advertising may be made observable and accountable. We find indications that young people (18-24), especially young men, are being targeted by unhealthy food, especially fast food, ads. We also find that unhealthy food brands use potentially harmful marketing strategies to appeal to children, young people, parents and the broader community, including cartoon characters, and associations with popular sports and greenwashing. The policy implications of our findings are that a broad prohibition on all forms of unhealthy food advertising online is desirable to protect not only children but also young people and the broader community. Such a prohibition will go one step towards addressing the commercial and digital determinants of health caused by harmful industries' use of online automated advertising.

Indexed as

AdvertisingFoodSocial MediaAdolescentAustraliaFast FoodsFemaleFood IndustryHealth PolicyHumansMaleMarketingYoung Adultadvertisingdigital platformsfast foodfood marketingonlineregulationsocial mediaunhealthy food

Identifiers

PMID40037915
PMCPMC11879644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.