ArticleHealth promotion international2025
A scoping review of children's and parents' attitudes to and awareness of digital food marketing.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inequalities in childhood overweight and obesity: A call to strengthen upstream policy measures.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Visual Attention to Food Content on Social Media: An Eye-Tracking Study Among Young Adults.Journal of eye movement research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital food marketing (DFM) of unhealthy foods and beverages (high in saturated fats, sugar and salt) to children and young people influences brand recall, recognition, purchase intentions and attitudes, and increases consumption of unhealthy foods and beverages. Understanding children's and parents' awareness of, and attitudes toward, such marketing is crucial for developing health-promoting advocacy and policy solutions. This registered systematic scoping review synthesized literature on children's, young people's and parents' attitudes and awareness of DFM. A structured search of Medline, PsycInfo, Academic Search Complete (Ebscohost), Scopus and CINAHL was conducted. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed studies focused on children (<18 years), young people (<24 years) or parents, published after 2000, examining attitudes or awareness of online marketing of food or non-alcoholic beverages. Data were extracted and charted in Excel. Forty studies were included for synthesis. Studies of children/young people (n = 31) show varying levels of awareness regarding DFM on social media and other digital media. While some understand social media marketing tactics, others struggle to recognize ads. Preferences lean towards influencer marketing and 'native' advertising styles. There is limited evidence on parents' views (n = 9 studies), but these suggest low parental awareness of digital marketing tactics targeting children, and unclear opinions on regulation. Overall, the findings suggest a need for a versatile, trans-disciplinary research and advocacy agenda to capture the complex and rapidly evolving digital marketing landscape, enhance critical digital literacies (including power inequalities) for both children and parents, increase knowledge-sharing and advocacy, and develop regulatory policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.