Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40037909›Full record

ReviewHealth promotion international2025

Advancing adolescent health promotion in the digital era.

Rebecca Raeside

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rebecca RaesideSusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Level 8, Susan Wakil Health Building, Western Ave, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2016-6393

Funding

NHMRC SOLVE-CHD Completion Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescents globally are calling for high-quality digital services to support and improve their health and well-being. Digital technologies are playing an increasing role in healthcare and whilst today's adolescents have been exposed to digital media since birth, there are unique challenges to their use that must be considered. This review aims to synthesize the literature on adolescent health promotion in the digital era. It provides evidence from adolescent perspectives and identifies that community-based and 'digital only' settings hold scope for further research to advance the field. The article recommends that when working with adolescents to develop digital health promotion tools, we should look to use youth engagement frameworks that are relevant to their context. Secondly, it demands stronger governance over digital media to protect adolescents, whilst allowing safe digital access. Finally, it demonstrates how listening to adolescents may help to address the emerging digital determinants of health and avoid exacerbating health disparities. Adolescents are powerful advocates to make global change. Stakeholders across research, policy and practice should examine how they incorporate adolescent voices to drive change in health promotion in the digital era.

Indexed as

Adolescent HealthDigital TechnologyHealth PromotionAdolescentHumansadolescentsdeterminants of healthdigital healthhealth promotionrisk factorsyouth engagement

Identifiers

PMID40037909
PMCPMC11879647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.