ArticleBMJ global health2025
Proof-of-principle of a technology transfer of a dried blood virus neutralisation assay to a Gavi-eligible country.
Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobal health clinical research is commonly led by high-income countries (HICs) as low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face barriers to participate, including lack of financial and human capacity and lack of research environment. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine development is also led by HICs, while LMICs carry the burden of life-threatening disease. Representative trials and research capacity strengthening in LMICs are needed to ensure global vaccine access and equity. This study aims to transfer an RSV neutralisation assay, which uses live cells and virus with inherent high variation, to a country eligible to receive support from the Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.
methodsUsing a train-the-trainer approach, a Ghanaian researcher was trained in the Netherlands on the dried blood-based RSV neutralisation assay. Subsequently, a Dutch researcher visited Ghana to support the process of adapting the technique to the Ghanaian setting. In a previously validated RSV neutralisation assay on dried blood, Hep-2 cells were infected with a serial dilution of sample-virus mixture to determine the half-maximal inhibitory concentration. Fifty-one dried blood and serum samples were tested in parallel in both countries to assess concordance.
resultsTraining and technology transfer was deemed successful, which was defined as neutralisation measurements by the Ghana team and high concordance (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC)>0.8). Neutralising capacity measured in identical samples in Ghana and the Netherlands correlated highly (Lin's CCC=0.87; Spearman rho=0.89) but was systematically lower in Ghana than the Netherlands.
conclusionWe show successful transfer of an RSV neutralisation assay, thereby strengthening the laboratory research capacity in a Gavi-eligible country. Reliable measurement of RSV neutralising antibodies in a Gavi-eligible country and the use of dried blood can contribute to inclusion of LMICs in RSV vaccine development and access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.