ReviewHeart (British Cardiac Society)2025
Transcriptional, proteomic and metabolic drivers of cardiac regeneration.
Review in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serum Proteomic Profiling Implicates a Dysregulated Neurohormonal-Inflammatory Axis in Post-Fontan Sinus Tachycardia.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- c-Myc: an emerging participant in heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Nuclear Autoantigenic Sperm Protein Promotes Cardiac Regeneration and Repair Through Activating the PDGFRB/AKT Pathway.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following injury, many organs are capable of rapid regeneration of necrotic tissue to regain normal function. In contrast, the damaged heart typically replaces tissue with a collagen-rich scar, due to the limited regenerative capacity of its functional contractile cardiomyocytes (CMs). However, this regenerative capacity varies dramatically during development and between species. Furthermore, studies have shown that cardiac regeneration can be enhanced to return contractile function to the damaged heart following myocardial infarction (MI). In this review, we outline the proliferative capacity of CMs
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.