Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40037677›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

'

Alistair Wardrope, Lindsay Blank, Melloney Ferrar, Steve Goodacre, Daniel Habershon, Markus Reuber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alistair WardropeDepartment of Neurosciences, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK a.wardrope@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3614-6346
Lindsay BlankSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Melloney FerrarSyncope and Cardiac Autonomic Service, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Steve GoodacreSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0803-8444
Daniel HabershonSpecialised Cancer Services, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Markus ReuberDepartment of Neurosciences, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTransient loss of consciousness (TLOC) is one of the most common neurological complaints in the Emergency Department (ED), but little is known about the patient perspective. We aimed to explore patient perceptions of diagnostic assessment for TLOC.

settingED, Acute Medical Unit and Syncope and Neurology clinics in a single tertiary teaching hospital in the north of England.

participants20 adult patients (60% female, age range 17-90 years) attending or referred with a first presentation of TLOC. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Exploratory thematic analysis of semistructured qualitative interviews.

resultsWe identified three themes within the data: satisfaction with care, unanswered questions and being left in limbo/no man's land. Participants explored these themes through four topics: communication; the role of investigations; the role of authority and the social context of care.

conclusionsCommunication (including differential diagnosis, significance of investigations and further assessments, and interim safety advice) is emphasised in supporting ongoing self-management, even before a definitive diagnosis is made.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionUnconsciousnessAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunicationEmergency Service, HospitalEnglandFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchYoung AdultACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINEEpilepsyFunctional Neurological DisorderPatient SatisfactionQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID40037677
PMCPMC11881173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.