Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40037675›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Examining experiences and system impacts of publicly funded episodic virtual care: protocol for a cross-provincial mixed methods study.

M Ruth Lavergne, Julie Easley, Ted McDonald, Agnes Grudniewicz, Stephanie Welton, Nichole Austin, Rebecca H Correia, Shelley Doucet, François Gallant, Emran Hasan and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Government partnerships with corporate virtual primary care.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

M Ruth LavergneDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada ruth.lavergne@dal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4205-4600
Julie EasleyDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Ted McDonaldUniversity of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Agnes GrudniewiczTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2960-8178
Stephanie WeltonDepartment of Family Medicine (South West Nova Site), Dalhousie University, Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4697-3165
Nichole AustinSchool of Health Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1230-9956
Rebecca H CorreiaDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2949-2400
Shelley DoucetDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4420-8199
François GallantDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Emran HasanDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Lindsay HeddenFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Tara KiranDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2520-112X
Lauren Lapointe-ShawDepartment of Medicine and IHPME, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Emily Gard MarshallDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8327-0329
Ruth Martin-MisenerSchool of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4554-7635
David RudolerFaculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7564-5829
Jennifer SplaneSchool of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth systems are under pressure as one in five Canadians have no regular place for primary care, with many experiencing substantial travel times and delays in accessing care. In the context of these urgent needs, platforms for virtual care offer immediate access to care in 'walk-in' style format, with limited continuity for ongoing health needs or coordination with other health services. We refer to these services as episodic virtual care (EVC), to distinguish them from virtual services offered in longitudinal primary care. The governments of Nova Scotia (NS) and New Brunswick (NB) both offer publicly funded EVC and offer a unique opportunity for research.The overarching goal of this work is to learn from the implementation of EVC in NS and NB to understand experiences and system impacts, includingWhat are patient perceptions and experiences of EVC and how do these differ by patient characteristics?What are the characteristics of patients who use EVC and of clinicians who deliver it?What are the system impacts of EVC? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use a cross-sectional survey conducted through an online questionnaire to explore patient perceptions and experiences with EVC. We will also examine how these differ based on the type of care needed, age, gender, residence (urban or rural), immigration and language preference. We will use linked administrative data and quasi-experimental analysis to assess the impacts of EVC on visits to community-based primary care (including in-person walk-in clinics), emergency department visits, prescriptions and referrals for other health services like laboratory testing, imaging and consulting specialist physicians. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This proposal has been reviewed and received approval from the Nova Scotia Health Research Ethics Board. Findings will identify the impacts and trade-offs in the deployment of EVC, which will inform primary care planning. In addition to traditional academic publications and information provided to primary care patients/the public, this study will inform decision-makers across multiple jurisdictions as they contend with the challenge of meeting patients' immediate care needs for access to primary care, while seeking to improve coordination and integration of systems as a whole.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityPrimary Health CareTelemedicineCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNew BrunswickNova ScotiaResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth Services AccessibilityPrimary Health CareTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID40037675
PMCPMC11881198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.