ArticleBMJ open2025
Women's perceptions of medicalised pregnancy and childbirth: an exploratory sequential mixed-method protocol study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe present study aimed to develop and assess psychometric properties of an instrument to measure the perception of women regarding the medicalisation of pregnancy and childbirth.
methodThis is a sequential exploratory mixed-method protocol study and will be conducted in three phases. In the first phase of the study, the hybrid conceptual model will define and explain the components of medicalisation. The hybrid approach includes a theoretical review (literature review) and a qualitative study. Using the results of the first phase, in the second phase of the study, the primary dimensions and items of the instrument will be developed. In the third phase, the psychometric properties of the designed instrument will be evaluated. Psychometric steps include face validity, content validity and construct validity. The research environment will be Al-Zahra and Taleghani educational centres, as well as health centres of Tabriz city and private offices of midwives and gynaecologists. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Informed consent has been obtained from all subjects. This protocol has been approved by the ethics committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR.TBZMED.REC.1403.352). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed manuscripts, reports and presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.