ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2025
National trends in oncology specialists' EHR inbox work, 2019-2022.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Large Language Models in Colorectal Cancer Care and Clinical Decision Support: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence-Generated Electronic Medical Record Summarization in Breast Surgical Oncology.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- EHR perception and momentary well-being in oncology professionals.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Beyond the patient: how providers perceive and experience non-medical barriers in gastrointestinal cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- A scoping review of studies on secure messaging through patient portals: persistent challenges and potential solutions.npj health systems · 2026Article
- A systematic review of early evidence on generative AI for drafting responses to patient messages.npj health systems · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundElectronic health record (EHR) burden is an important driver of the ongoing physician burnout crisis. In particular, EHR-based messaging (also known as "inbox")-including messages from patients-is associated with burnout and decreased well-being. Little is known about EHR messaging burden for oncologists. To address this gap, we assessed trends in oncologist EHR messaging volume and EHR time from 2019 to 2022 across oncology subspecialties.
methodsThis study used EHR metadata for all US oncology physicians (including medical oncologist/hematologists, radiation oncologists, pediatric oncologists, gynecologic oncologists, and surgical oncologists) providing ambulatory care using an Epic EHR system to measure inbox volume and EHR time from July 2019 through April 2022. Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression were used to evaluate differences over time and across subspecialties.
resultsThis sample of 15 653 oncology physicians across 43 228 633 ambulatory visits found that message volume for oncologists increased 19.0% from 2019 to 2022, and patient-initiated messages increased 34.0%. The EHR time increased 16.2% from 2019 to 2022, whereas EHR "work outside of work" time increased 12.1%. Medical oncologist/hematologists had the highest inbox volume, patient-message volume, and EHR time of oncology subspecialists.
conclusionRising levels of EHR work and message volume among oncology physicians are concerning given the role of EHR burden in physician burnout. Oncologists have seen increased EHR time and message volume, especially patient-initiated messages, following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Health system leaders and policymakers should invest in efforts to reduce EHR and inbox burden for all oncologists, with a focus on physicians with the greatest burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.