Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40037615›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2025

ForestForward: visualizing and accessing integrated world forest data from the last 50 years.

E L Tejada-Gutiérrez, J Mateo Fornés, F Solsona, R Alves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E L Tejada-GutiérrezDepartment Ciències Mèdiques Bàsiques, Universitat de Lleida, Lleida 25198, Spain.
J Mateo FornésDepartment d'Enginyeria Informàtica, Universitat de Lleida, Lleida 25005, Spain.
F SolsonaDepartment d'Enginyeria Informàtica, Universitat de Lleida, Lleida 25005, Spain.
R AlvesDepartment Ciències Mèdiques Bàsiques, Universitat de Lleida, Lleida 25198, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8112-5184

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitigating the effects of environmental exploitation on forests requires robust data analysis tools to inform sustainable management strategies and enhance ecosystem resilience. Access to extensive, integrated plant biodiversity data, spanning decades, is essential for this purpose. However, such data are often fragmented across diverse datasets with varying standards, posing two key challenges: first, integrating these datasets into a unified, well-structured data warehouse, and second, handling the vast volume of data using big data technologies to analyze and monitor the temporal evolution of ecosystems. To address these challenges, we developed and used an extract, transform, and load (ETL) protocol that curated and integrates 4482 forestry datasets from around the world, dating back to the 18th century, into a 100-GB data warehouse containing over 172 million records sourced from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility repository. We implemented Python scripts and a NoSQL MongoDB database to streamline and automate the ETL process, using the data warehouse to create the ForestForward web platform. ForestForward is a free, user-friendly application developed using the Django framework, which enables users to consult, download, and visualize the curated data. The platform allows users to explore data layers by year and observe the temporal evolution of ecosystems through visual representations. Database URL: https://forestforward.udl.cat.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualForestsSoftwareBiodiversity

Identifiers

PMID40037615
PMCPMC11879282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.