ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025
Patient perspectives on the impact of appearance and weight changes attributed to systemic glucocorticoid treatment of rheumatic diseases.
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning to live with RA as an unwelcome companion-patients' experiences after 1 to 2 years of DMARD treatment.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- Measurement of the impact of giant cell arteritis and treatment with glucocorticoids on health-related quality of life.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026Review
- Smartphone App-Based Eating Behavior Monitoring and Feedback Intervention for Glucocorticoid-Induced Appetite Increase in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Mapping Use of High Dose or Long-Term Oral Glucocorticoids and Steroid-Sparing Strategies in Adults With Chronic Conditions: A Rapid Scoping Review of Reviews.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore patients' perspectives on the impact of appearance changes attributed to glucocorticoid treatment.
methodsA secondary inductive thematic analysis was conducted of the 'Steroid PRO' semi-structured interviews with patients with rheumatic conditions receiving glucocorticoids in the UK, USA and Australia.
resultsSixty patient interviews were analysed. Patient age was 26-84 years; 39 (65%) were female; and the patients had systemic vasculitis (n = 19), inflammatory arthritis (n = 14), crystal arthropathy (n = 2), connective tissue disorders (n = 16) or other/multiple (n = 9). In addition to participants expressing the need for more information and support, three over-arching themes were identified: (i) societal norms ['I think my main concern, particularly being female, was the weight gain that the steroids had' (female aged 26-30)]; these included real or perceived expectations to which participants felt pressure to conform, which were sustained through interactions with others; (ii) harms to mental health and sense of self ['It makes you feel down. It makes you feel depressed. You don't want to socialize because you're not you' (male aged 61-65)]; glucocorticoids were described as making participants 'not look like' themselves, associated with changes in mood and self-confidence; and (iii) burden of adjustments ['I have a wardrobe right now that goes four different sizes' (female aged 51-55)]; other adjustments related to diet, exercise, work, hobbies, activities of daily living and key life events.
conclusionPatients attribute a variety of impacts on their quality of life to glucocorticoid-related appearance changes. We suggest ways to meet patients' needs for information and support, which can be developed through further work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.