ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2025
Protocol for improving equity in quantitative big data cleaning: lessons from longitudinal analysis of electronic health records from underrepresented and marginalized communities.
Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLarge biomedical datasets, including electronic health records (EHRs), are a significant source of epidemiologic data. To prepare an EHR for analysis, there are several data-cleaning approaches; here, we focus on data filtering. Common data-filtering methods employ rules that rely on data from socially constructed dominant populations but are inappropriate for marginalized populations, leading to the loss of valuable data and neglect of underrepresented communities. We propose a novel method based on a phenomenological framework that is more equitable and inclusive, leading to culturally responsive research and discoveries.
methodsEHRs from the Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation (YKHC) containing 1 262 035 records from 12 402 unique individuals from 2002 to 2012 were cleaned by using the proposed phenomenological (individual) and common (cohort) data-filtering approach. Within the phenomenological framework, we (i) excluded values that were undeniably biologically impossible for any population, (ii) excludes values that fell outside three standard deviations from the mean value for each individual person, and (iii) used two forms of imputation methods for stable quantitative and qualitative values at the individual level when data were missing.
resultsCompared with common data-filtering practices, the phenomenological approach retained more observations, participants, and a range of outcomes, allowing a truer representation of the priority population. In sensitivity analyses comparing the results of the raw data, the common approach implemented, and the phenomenological approach applied, we found that the phenomenological approach did not compromise the integrity of the results.
conclusionThe phenomenological approach to filtering big data presents an opportunity to better advocate for marginalized communities even when using large datasets that require automated rules for data filtering. Our method may empower researchers who are partnering with communities to embrace large datasets without compromising their commitment to community benefit and respect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.