Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40037558›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2025

Protocol for improving equity in quantitative big data cleaning: lessons from longitudinal analysis of electronic health records from underrepresented and marginalized communities.

Zeruiah V Buchanan, Scarlett E Hopkins, Bert B Boyer, Alison E Fohner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zeruiah V BuchananDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4147-6633
Scarlett E HopkinsDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, OR, United States.
Bert B BoyerDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, OR, United States.
Alison E FohnerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4231-3331

Funding

Integrated multi-omics approach to identify early protein biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease and cognitive declineK01AG071689 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FOHNER, ALISON ELIZABETH · 2022 to 2025
$488k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG071689University of Washington School of Public Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge biomedical datasets, including electronic health records (EHRs), are a significant source of epidemiologic data. To prepare an EHR for analysis, there are several data-cleaning approaches; here, we focus on data filtering. Common data-filtering methods employ rules that rely on data from socially constructed dominant populations but are inappropriate for marginalized populations, leading to the loss of valuable data and neglect of underrepresented communities. We propose a novel method based on a phenomenological framework that is more equitable and inclusive, leading to culturally responsive research and discoveries.

methodsEHRs from the Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation (YKHC) containing 1 262 035 records from 12 402 unique individuals from 2002 to 2012 were cleaned by using the proposed phenomenological (individual) and common (cohort) data-filtering approach. Within the phenomenological framework, we (i) excluded values that were undeniably biologically impossible for any population, (ii) excludes values that fell outside three standard deviations from the mean value for each individual person, and (iii) used two forms of imputation methods for stable quantitative and qualitative values at the individual level when data were missing.

resultsCompared with common data-filtering practices, the phenomenological approach retained more observations, participants, and a range of outcomes, allowing a truer representation of the priority population. In sensitivity analyses comparing the results of the raw data, the common approach implemented, and the phenomenological approach applied, we found that the phenomenological approach did not compromise the integrity of the results.

conclusionThe phenomenological approach to filtering big data presents an opportunity to better advocate for marginalized communities even when using large datasets that require automated rules for data filtering. Our method may empower researchers who are partnering with communities to embrace large datasets without compromising their commitment to community benefit and respect.

Indexed as

Big DataElectronic Health RecordsMinority GroupsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleSocial MarginalizationAlaska Nativecardiometaboliccommunity-based participatory researchdata cleaningdata filteringYup’ik

Identifiers

PMID40037558
PMCPMC12225664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.