Trial reportRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025
Efficacy and safety of avacopan in patients aged 65 years and older with ANCA-associated vasculitis: a post hoc analysis of data from the ADVOCATE trial.
Trial report in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-database pharmacovigilance identifies disproportionate reporting of hepatobiliary events with avacopan: an integrative study with network pharmacology and interpretable machine learning.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in rheumatic diseases.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2026Review
- Targeting the complement system in ANCA-associated vasculitis management.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Addressing clinical challenges in ANCA-associated vasculitis with real-world evidence.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Successful reintegration of a very elderly patient with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis due to microscopic polyangiitis after multidisciplinary treatment: a case report.Frontiers in nephrology · 2026Article
- The safety profiles of avacopan on microscopic polyangiitis and granulomatosis with polyangiitis: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of avacopan in patients aged ≥65 years with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) in the phase 3 ADVOCATE trial of avacopan vs a prednisone taper, plus either rituximab or cyclophosphamide.
methodsIn this descriptive, post hoc analysis, patients receiving avacopan or a prednisone taper were stratified by age. Key efficacy outcomes included the rate of remission at week 26 and sustained remission at week 52.
resultsOf 160 patients aged ≥65, 109 were aged 65-74 and 51 were ≥75. Remission at week 26 was achieved in 71.7% vs 69.4% of patients aged 65-74 and 73.1% vs 72.0% aged ≥75 in the avacopan vs prednisone taper groups, respectively. Sustained remission at week 52 was observed in 65.0% vs 55.1% of patients aged 65-74 and 65.4% vs 56.0% aged ≥75. Relapse rates in the avacopan vs prednisone taper groups were 12.3% vs 18.8% and 3.8% vs 20.8% in the 65-74 and ≥75 subgroups, respectively. Improvements in estimated glomerular filtration rate and health-related quality of life were observed in both treatment groups. Use of avacopan compared with a prednisone taper was associated with a 61% and 49% reduction in mean glucocorticoid dose in the 65-74 and ≥75 subgroups, respectively, and lower glucocorticoid toxicity. The proportions of patients with adverse events were similar between treatment groups within each age subgroup.
conclusionThese data support the efficacy and safety of an avacopan-based regimen to treat patients with GPA or MPA aged ≥65.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.