Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40037556›Full record

Trial reportRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025

Efficacy and safety of avacopan in patients aged 65 years and older with ANCA-associated vasculitis: a post hoc analysis of data from the ADVOCATE trial.

Duvuru Geetha, Christian Pagnoux, Sebastian E Sattui, Peter A Merkel, Maria Weiner, Juliana Draibe, Stanislas Faguer, Sarah Bray, Rachel E Gurlin, Monica Balcells-Oliver and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in rheumatic diseases.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Duvuru GeethaDivision of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8353-5542
Christian PagnouxDivision of Rheumatology, Vasculitis Clinic, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6287-9549
Sebastian E SattuiDivision of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3945-6828
Peter A MerkelDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9284-7345
Maria WeinerDepartment of Nephrology and Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8183-3984
Juliana DraibeDepartment of Nephrology, Bellvitge University Hospital, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Stanislas FaguerDepartment of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0553-0927
Sarah BrayBiostatistics, Amgen Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Rachel E GurlinMedical Affairs, Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6139-4328
Monica Balcells-OliverGlobal Medical Affairs, CSL Vifor, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0002-2924-7333
Annette BruchfeldDepartment of Nephrology and Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9752-9941
David R JayneDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1712-0637
ADVOCATE Study Group

Funding

AmgenAstraZenecaBristol Myers Squibb FoundationChemoCentryxGlaxoSmithKlineNational Center for Advancing Transitional SciencesNIAMS NIH HHSRheumatology Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of avacopan in patients aged ≥65 years with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) in the phase 3 ADVOCATE trial of avacopan vs a prednisone taper, plus either rituximab or cyclophosphamide.

methodsIn this descriptive, post hoc analysis, patients receiving avacopan or a prednisone taper were stratified by age. Key efficacy outcomes included the rate of remission at week 26 and sustained remission at week 52.

resultsOf 160 patients aged ≥65, 109 were aged 65-74 and 51 were ≥75. Remission at week 26 was achieved in 71.7% vs 69.4% of patients aged 65-74 and 73.1% vs 72.0% aged ≥75 in the avacopan vs prednisone taper groups, respectively. Sustained remission at week 52 was observed in 65.0% vs 55.1% of patients aged 65-74 and 65.4% vs 56.0% aged ≥75. Relapse rates in the avacopan vs prednisone taper groups were 12.3% vs 18.8% and 3.8% vs 20.8% in the 65-74 and ≥75 subgroups, respectively. Improvements in estimated glomerular filtration rate and health-related quality of life were observed in both treatment groups. Use of avacopan compared with a prednisone taper was associated with a 61% and 49% reduction in mean glucocorticoid dose in the 65-74 and ≥75 subgroups, respectively, and lower glucocorticoid toxicity. The proportions of patients with adverse events were similar between treatment groups within each age subgroup.

conclusionThese data support the efficacy and safety of an avacopan-based regimen to treat patients with GPA or MPA aged ≥65.

Indexed as

Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated VasculitisGranulomatosis with PolyangiitisMicroscopic PolyangiitisAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCyclophosphamideDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMalePrednisoneRemission InductionRituximabCyclophosphamideGlucocorticoidsImmunosuppressive AgentsPrednisoneRituximabAAVageavacopanGPAMPA

Identifiers

PMID40037556
PMCPMC12107037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.